Skip to main content
TOMPW Service logo
TOMPW

Knowledge Hub · Topic

Test & DFT guides

Wafer sort, final test, DFT architecture, burn-in, SLT and quality targets — what each step costs, when it is needed and what to prepare before tape-out.

Probe station contacting a wafer during wafer sort
May 8, 2024↻ 20267 min readTOMPW

Wafer Sort (CP) vs Final Test (FT): What Each One Catches

Circuit probe and final test are not redundant. Learn what wafer sort catches cheaply, what only final test can see, and how to split coverage between them.

TestCP
Automated test equipment floor with IC handlers
June 11, 2024↻ 20268 min readTOMPW

ATE Time, Probe Cards and Load Boards: Where Test Cost Really Goes

Test cost is usually quoted as a per-hour tester rate. The real drivers are test time, tester class and the NRE of probe cards and load boards.

TestATE
Close view of a packaged IC on a test socket
July 2, 2024↻ 20268 min readTOMPW

DFT Basics: Scan, BIST and JTAG for ASIC Teams

Design for test is decided before tape-out, not after wafer return. A plain-language guide to scan, compression, BIST and boundary scan.

TestDFT
Burn-in oven trays holding packaged ICs
August 14, 2024↻ 20269 min readTOMPW

Reliability Qualification: HTOL, ESD and AEC-Q100 Explained

What qualification actually proves, which stresses are standard, and when a part genuinely needs AEC-Q100 versus a lighter qualification plan.

TestQualification
Burn-in boards loaded with packaged devices
September 10, 2024↻ 20267 min readTOMPW

Burn-In and System-Level Test: When They Pay For Themselves

Burn-in and SLT are expensive insertions. Learn which failure modes justify them and which programs should skip both.

TestBurn-In
Yield wafer map displayed on a monitor
October 16, 2024↻ 20267 min readTOMPW

DPPM Targets and Yield: Setting Test Escape Limits That Make Sense

DPPM is a business decision dressed up as a test metric. How to set a defensible target and what it costs to hit it.

TestYield
X-ray of a QFP package used in production test
March 19, 2024↻ 20268 min readTOMPW

Reducing Test Cost: DFT, Yield and ATE Strategy

Test cost is paid on every die, good or bad. Learn how design-for-test, yield learning and ATE strategy cut cost per good unit without shipping risk.

TestDFT

How to work through it

The order these decisions actually arrive in

01

Decide the DFT architecture, before tape-out

Scan, BIST and JTAG structure decide what silicon can be observed later. This is a design decision with a test bill attached, and it cannot be retrofitted cheaply.

02

Split coverage between CP and FT

Wafer sort removes bad die before packaging money is spent; final test proves the packaged part. Deciding what each insertion catches is the single biggest lever on cost per good unit.

03

Model where the test money goes

Tester minutes, load board, handler and probe card — one-time hardware against per-part seconds. The mix, not the tester rate, usually decides the number.

04

Decide whether extra insertions pay

Burn-in and system-level test catch failure modes that ATE misses. They are worth it for some products and dead money for others.

05

Set the quality target and prove it

DPPM and yield targets define how much test is enough, and qualification is the evidence a customer or an automotive programme will ask for.

Which guide answers what

Pick by question, not by title

QuestionReadWhat it settles
Do I need both wafer sort and final test?cp vs ft testingWhat each insertion catches, and what skipping CP costs once packaging is paid for
Where does test cost actually go?ate and probe card costTester time, load board, probe card and handler — one-time vs per-unit
How much DFT is enough?dft basics scan bist jtagCoverage against test time, area and schedule
Do I need burn-in or SLT?burn in and slt when neededWhich failure modes justify an extra insertion, and which programmes should skip it
What escape rate can I accept?dppm and yield targetsAutomotive against consumer DPPM targets, and what tightening them costs
What does qualification actually require?reliability qualification htol esd aec q100HTOL, temperature cycling, ESD, latch-up and the AEC-Q100 grades

Numbers to sanity-check against

Reference figures

  • Test share of chip cost

    Commonly cited at 15–30%, higher for mixed-signal and RF

  • Automotive DPPM target

    Single digits to ~50 escapes per million shipped

  • Consumer DPPM target

    Commonly 100–200 escapes per million shipped

  • Scan compression

    Widely used at 50–100×, turning minutes of test time into seconds

Industry-wide reference points, not quotations. Your numbers depend on node, package, volume and test coverage — model them with the tools below.

EXECUTION

How TOMPW runs it

Connect CP, FT and reliability planning so packaged silicon is measurable, debuggable and ready for customer evaluation.

Test & Product Engineeringservice →